Thursday, 31 January 2013
-
U.S. Study: Men Who Do the Woman's Chores Get Less Sex

According to a study published in the American Sociological Review journal based on data collected between 1992 and 1994, traditional gender roles regarding household chores can influence a couple's sex life. In heterosexual married couples, it was found that there's an increase in the frequency of sex when the woman does the dishes, cleans, shops and cooks, and the man maintains the car and does yard work, for example.Julie Brines, who co-authored the study and is an associate professor of sociology at the University of Washington states, "In particular, it seems that the gender identities husbands and wives express through the chores they do also help structure sexual behavior." Do men now have an excuse to avoid doing the dishes, choosing instead to help rescue imaginary princesses in castles and murder Middle Eastern men in war games? Why work when you can get laid, right?
It's not quite that easy, as lead author Sabino Kornrich explains. "Men who refuse to help around the house could increase conflict in their marriage and lower their wives' marital satisfaction." In households where gender identities were reversed, it was reported that sex occurred 1.6 times less often. Of course, the most glaringly obvious aspect of the study is that the data, which polled 4,500 heterosexual married couples, was gathered in the early 90's and the strive for gender equality has progressed substantially since then. So would the data tell a different tale if a new study were to be conducted today?
Not a chance, if you were to ask Brines. "Marriage today isn't what it was 30 or 40 years ago, but there are some things that remain important," she said. "Sex and housework are still key aspects of sharing a life, and both are related to marital satisfaction and how spouses express their gender identity." Does this mean that it's easier to sustain a happy, more sexually active marriage if you conform to gender roles? In order to arrive at some sort of answer, it's necessary to look at the relationship between "femininity" and "masculinity," which are shaped socio-culturally. As both "feminine" and "masculine" characteristics are learned and molded by our observations as a culture, you can see why it would be impossible to come up with a "correct" answer. Since the study is U.S. based however, it narrows the field.

This particular study is backing its findings on the idea that gender identities and thus the differences present in heterosexual relationships, are complimentary and create attraction or sexual desire. It's basing its conclusion on the idea that "sexual scripts" govern the "when, why and how" of sex. A "sexual script" defines when a situation is sexual, and has three levels: the cultural/historical, the social/interactive and the personal/intra-psychic. This theory or concept was first introduced in the book Sexual Conduct by sociologists John H. Gagnon and William Simon in 1973.
To clarify, here's a passage taken from the study:
"Other recent research finds that men experience greater sexual dysfunction when their partners spend more time with the men’s friends than men do themselves, suggesting that behaviors that threaten men’s independence and masculinity lead to greater sexual dysfunction (Cornwell and Laumann 2011). Given the general importance of gender, we suspect that scripts continue to link sexual behavior to masculinity or femininity among heterosexual married couples. If so, expressions of gender difference should help to create sexual desire."
It seems like a fairly simple conclusion to make, but there are always arguments to the contrary stating that humans are complex and aren't always governed by their sexual desires. If our gender identities are a product of many outside factors and you flip the proverbial sexual script, are you left with the suggestion that these deviations are less successful or sexually fulfilling?
To nitpick, what of couples who don't have yards or vehicles? What if general maintenance of the kitchen sink for example, is handled by a plumber? Should the male help out and do some of the chores the female would otherwise be relegated to, or should he simply not do any chores in this case? How would that affect their sex life? I think the lives of married individuals vary too greatly, as do work schedules. I can't help but feel like this research was geared more towards middle-class, suburban couples living in the south.
Do you believe traditional gender identities are important to maintain in a marriage? Have you had more success in your relationships when your significant other was more traditionally 'masculine' or 'feminine'?Sincerely,
Nuñez Love Doctor.Certified with a PhD in Gender-inauthenticity.
Post a Comment
- Back to datingish's Datingish Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in datingish's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)


Recommend


Comments (37)
I ignore half the stuff that comes out in those studies. Usually, it's propaganda or has some other function.
Maybe it's because women who do those things are homemakers more times than not. They don't work and thus are from more privileged backgrounds.
Those couples might have more leisure time.
I don't have time to read the study, but I'm sure you can find the fallacy.
@Colorsofthenight@xanga - Exactly.
If my husband did the chores, he'd get blowjobs every night and the use of plural was intentional. We'd play Hop on Pop everyday when I got home and before my son came home, but I am easy and slutty so maybe I'm an outlier.
Original Article (from Julie Brines' biography of the University of Washington website): http://www.soc.washington.edu/users/brines/jbrines.pdf
I don't know much about sociology, but I have read a research article or two in my lifetime! Enough to be able to cast some doubts on the simple conclusion that any man who wants to get laid should do less housework...
Despite that the article which you linked to claims that the data was collected from 1992-1994, it was ACTUALLY collected in 1985. Overall, this data is fairly old (older than I am!), and I think it's kind of ridiculous that this woman believes that marital relationships haven't changed at all in 28 years. The author states that the sample was restricted to "black and white husbands and wives" 18 years and older who had been married for at least three years. Also, participants were restricted to "members of unions where neither partner was jobless at the time due to retirement, physical disability, schooling, or confinement to an institution." So that excludes a decent amount of people-- they didn't even try to survey people who weren't "white" or "black." When I looked at the age data, the mean age of the husbands was 39 years old and the mean age of the wives was 36 years old. So this is a study of people who were mostly born in the late 1940s... when they were growing up, things were very different from how they are now.
This is a VERY OLD study. Why is it in the news all of a sudden?
@Colorsofthenight@xanga - Not to mention the media runs with the simplest conclusions.
He doesn't have time for sex; he's taking care of the house. Obviously ;)
@Colorsofthenight@xanga - @Erika_Steele@xanga - actually, i got the opposite impression--that the housewife comes from a background where she's not educated or otherwise doesn't feel empowered to win her own bread, so to speak.
@Erika_Steele@xanga - haha no I feel the same way if I had a partner who did the chores they would be getting lucky every day haha
There is also a strong correlation between ice cream sales and crime rate so take the conclusion of these studies with a grain of salt.
Theoretically, at some point in your life you were living on your own and doing all the cooking and cleaning. You get married and suddenly you no longer have to do those things because you have a pair of testicles? Sorry, not gonna fly.
Do I think housework needs to be divided 50/50? No, that's not realistic usually. Nor do I think all men need to become domestic gods and start doing flower arrangements on the weekends. But if I'm cooking all your meals, you can do the dishes. Besides that, it's common courtesy to pick up after yourself.
If a guy was seriously like "Oh god, I'm doing laundry, this is so emasculating! Wahhh." He either cares way too much about 'societal norms' or he's ridiculously insecure.
another sex equation study
like sex is somehow an "if ___, then ____" postulate.
personally, i like free variables.
regardless of the fact that this study was done over 10 years ago, all I can say is this: from my own personal experience, the man that gets busier in the kitchen gets busier in the bedroom.
Though this will be a side rant, here is my take on the issue. I have been dancing Argentine Tango for a few years, and in order to earn my stripes, so to speak, in the tango world, I assist a professional dancer in his classes. This dance is very gender heavy, there is a male part and a female part. The gender expectations paint pictures of how the ideal women or man is supposed to act, and as a results creates scripts. This script was romantic, sexy. Hell, when is tango not associate with the sensual? (I should probably rephrase and say in recent history...tomato, to-mah-to)
After the feminist movement, the script was torn up, burned and then shoved out the window. Now what? Bear with me, there is a method to my madness. I swear.Women flood these classes (mine at least), most coming from elite female colleges where roughly 50% of the population has done away with men completely. Yet, 90% ALL WISH TO LEARN THE FEMALE PART. Unfortunately, we did lose apart of our identity when we demanded to be equal to men and a huge portion of our social script. There was something lost, the know-how to interact between genders.I think that sex does increase during traditional genders role because it is the sexual script that has been happening for generations. However, I mostly think this is a result of the confusion and when confused we resort to tradition. Through tradition, we find comfort. Let's be honest, sex, at least consensual, is instigated more often when both parties are comfortable.Of course, this a muddled shortened version of my long winded rant of the complexities of romance in light of feminism.
OP Fail...
Hmmm. I just read a study based on data collected between 1967-1969, that said that someone in 2013 would write a post using data collected between 1992-1994, and the people in 2013, would consider it to be a dated generalization.
I guess these studies ARE accurate!
Bahahahaha what a bullshit study. I mean, come on.. if he doesn't help me in the dishes, there's no possible chance we'll have to stop what we're doing and go at it right there on the kitchen counter. I mean, what?
@Erika_Steele@xanga - Ha, yes, I was going to say, if the guy does more doesn't he get laid more often?
Personally, I actually like doing chores, not to be rewarded but hey, won't turn that down.
I don't believe in the whole 'gender roles' theory, we have moved way past that by now.
It's probably correlation does not imply causation. (Less sex is NOT the result of more chores for men)
It's probably do to a reversal of the roles...and in those couples, the woman is in charge (im guessing).
And in couples where the woman is in charge, it usually means more submissive men which women have lowered respect for.
Lowered respect for their partner = less sex , less emotional feeling and it's more about having some dude around to take care of the kids rather than personal emotional satisfaction
@Erika_Steele@xanga - just to clarify, you aren't *rewarding* him for doing chores are you? or is it just a matter of having more time?
because if you reward men with sex, you are saying your body is worth more than his. That'll cause A LOT of resentment on his part long term. He probably will never vocalize it with you, but it's a rumbling volcano, swept under the rug by passive aggressive men that will eventually pop and either he will go somewhere else for sex, or you two will be broken up.
I know that with many couples who follow traditional gender roles, they have more sex for different reasons than who does the chores. There's a lot more to it than that.
Correlation does not equal causation.
That's all I'm going to say.
@nonurbusinessyo@xanga - *stuffs face with choco tacos* FUCK DA POLICE
But is the sex more enjoyable?
"1.6 times less often." what does that mean? if you had sex 5 times during the period you would have it only 3 or 4 times? or that you have 60% less sex? or that there was some sort of anti-mode, you got laid so few times, that it took 1.6*period to have the same number of instances?