Friday, 20 July 2012

  • Sexual Flexibility: The Flexuality Test


    Flexuality, James W. Hicks, M.D.'s blog about human sexuality, offers an anonymous Flexuality (or Sexual Flexibility) Test. The test, "assesses your attitudes, feelings, experiences, and desires." Although most of us are familiar with the Kinsey Scale or the general idea that sexual orientation isn't rigid or binary, this particular test is unique in that, "...Your answers will be automatically analyzed to generate a sexual profile, with reference to a dozen sexual types [including Heteroflexible, Supersexual, Ambisexual, Asexual, Flexamorous, Metamorphic, Transitioning, Restrained, Gay or Lesbian, Queer, Versatile, Macho, or Straight]."

    Click here to enter the site and take the Flexuality Test!
     
    At the beginning of the test, when asked to identify as "gay," "straight," or "bisexual,"
     I identified as "straight."
    If the subject of sexual orientation ever comes up in conversation with friends or acquaintances, I half-playfully/half-seriously refer to myself as, "Heteroflexible" or "Predominantly Straight." Flexuality defines Heteroflexible as, "open to fooling around with someone of the same sex, even though you generally consider yourself straight." Yep. Sounds about spot-on. 
     
    Simply put: Although I occasionally find myself sexually attracted to a woman and would consider acting on that attraction if an opportunity to do so presented itself organically, mostly, I crush on dudes. I dig (and crave) virility -- deep voices, facial scruff, height, shoulders, the smell of men's cologne and aftershave. In the past, I've only ever had -- and only ever wanted -- boyfriends. When I envision my future long-term partner, he's consistently a he.   
     
    So I was surprised and admittedly, a little taken aback when my Flexuality Test Report suggested that I'm Ambisexual, as opposed to Heteroflexible. According to Flexuality, "If you are similarly sexually aroused by both women and men, then you are ambisexual. This is the simplest, classic type of bisexuality: a 'Kinsey 3' on the heterosexual-homosexual seven-point scale.

    The prefix in the word ambisexual puts the emphasis more specifically on the equivalence of desire for both men and women, as distinct from other manifestations of bisexuality, though you may also feel comfortable calling yourself bisexual. The term 'AC-DC' has been applied to those who derive equal sexual satisfaction from both sexes, or you might refer to your desires as '50-50.' Ambisexual is probably the most natural condition, the one that would emerge most commonly if society did not so strongly encourage heterosexuality and pathologize homosexual desire, skewing the bell curve that would otherwise define a population’s erotic tastes." 

    What interested me more than the results themselves was my knee-jerk reaction to them (something along the lines of, "HUH? No. No way. This is definitely wrong..."). I think of myself as an extremely broad-minded person, especially when it comes to matters of sex and sexuality.

    My friends would unanimously agree that I deem no topic taboo. A number of my family members are gay. A handful of my closest female friends identify as lesbian or bisexual. I had no problem answering the Flexuality Test's questions honestly and uninhibitedly; indeed, these results are based on thoroughly truthful, uncensored responses. That said, I experience a bit of cognitive dissonance when I try the identity of someone who, "derives equal sexual satisfaction from both sexes" on for size in my mind. My self-definition doesn't quite align with my most authentic self.  

    All I can say is this: My fantasies are my fantasies. My attractions are my attractions. My behavior is my behavior. I'm willing to own it all, but I'm ultimately more than the sum of my thoughts, feelings, actions, and proclivities. When it comes to being put in any sort of quantifying box -- even if that box is less confining than the traditional labels of "gay," "straight," or "bisexual" -- I immediately become uncomfortable.

    In the same vein, although I write poetry and take writing poetry seriously, I feel uncomfortable calling myself, "a poet." I'm a lot of things, for that matter: a reader, a blogger, a walk-taker, a yogini, a dancer, a friend, a daughter, a driver, a phone-chatter, an errand-runner, a movie-watcher, a tooth-brusher, a mascara-applier, a laundry-doer, an email-checker, a salad-maker, etc., etc., etc. A few lines from Anne Sexton's The Interrogation of The Man of Many Hearts come to mind: "I called her the woman in red. / I called her the girl in pink / but she was ten colors / and ten women / I could hardly name her." Like everyone else, I'm a complicated, continually evolving being. Please, don't try to name me.  

    The test results and my response to them have given me a considerable amount to reflect on -- not related to my sexual identity so much as the chasm between how we, as humans, CHOOSE TO *DEFINE* OURSELVES and WHAT WE *ACTUALLY* THINK, FEEL, AND DO.  

    How do you identify sexually? What do your Flexuality Test results indicate? What was your reaction to your results? 

    image source 

Comments (21)

  • PrisonerxOfxLove@xanga

    That test is very suspicious. Far too many questions about sexual orientation and they asked about sexual flexibility over and over.

    Also, before beginning the test they made it clear that they were keeping the information. God only knows how that can be used to ruin someone's life should they run for public office.

    I also recommend deleting your browser cookies after visiting that site.
  • ulvenNixie@xanga

    This was fun :)

    I consider myself straight, but the test came back as ambisexual. I thought that was very interesting. I was as honest as I could possibly be with the test. I don't have a problem with this determination. It won't be something I'll be acting on though.

    Great post!

  • reesa14@xanga

    I also got ambisexual and suspected I would.


    I have never really cared much for defining my sexual orientation. I like who I like and touch who I wanna touch. If I decided I wanted a relationship with a female I would cross that road when need be. 
  • Cambios@xanga

    Flexamorous. Which I already knew.

  • pnrj@xanga

    I like that test, and how it eschews the usual categories in favor of a new framework.

    I also rated as ambisexual and flexamorous, which doesn't particularly surprise me.

    What I did find surprising was how low I rated on all the dimensions on the second graph. I expected at least moderate "versatile" but rated 0. I expected some "metamorphic" and rated only 2. "transitioning" 0, "macho" 0, and "supersexual" 2, and "restrained" 2 were less surprising. 

  • Edeline_Wrigh@xanga

    I got ambisexual followed closely by flexamorous. It's close, but I think the whole profile explains it better (I tend to call myself "bi-leaning-lesbian," which is reflected in the outer categories rather well.)


    I dislike the definition given to "supersexual" - ie, the implication that it's "mostly straight" people seeking out new experiences. I feel that looking for novelty in sex is a cross-orientation thing and it bothers me that it's limited in this way (not to mention that it's ironic that someone leaning lesbian scored highly on something that's used to define "mostly straight" people...). Seeking out the same gender when one normally wouldn't isn't the only way to seek new/novelty sexual experiences.
  • P0RCELA1N_D0LL@xanga

    I'm Straight and Metamorphic metamorphic is true because I love masculine inspired clothing tailored to fit women. I love dressing like a male kpop star in their fitted suits but I'm a girl I have girly clothing, but I also love "guy" clothes. I was at the department store and I saw all these cool tshirt designs at the guy's section. then the female section didn't have tees like that. I don't really look in the men's section, but the boys section rofl I'm petite, so the boys section fits me. I love their skater style that the girls/women's section doesn't have. I like clothing of all styles. I like roleplaying clothing-wise, but I'm not attracted to women while dressed like a guy.

    http://flexuality.wordpress.com/2010/10/17/metamorphic/

  • Kristenmomof3@xanga
  • TakingxOverxMe@xanga

    Flexamorous, followed by ambisexual.  Interesting test.

  • Jenny_Wren@xanga

    I took it. I'm pure heterosexual, haha.


    Also, Anne Sexton is *amazing*.
  • deemure@xanga

    Flexamorous...interesting

  • Digital_Angel21@xanga

    Says I'm straight with a hint of flexamorous. And all my sexual traits were 0, so I don't know what that means. Anyway, sounds right. I like guys, and all the things about them (boy smell, stubble, their hard ons). I've never been sexually attracted to another woman, though I've had crushes on them (I desire their company and their affection, but not in a sexual way). Never kissed a girl, no desire to. If I find myself in love with a woman instead of a man, I'm not going to freak out and question my life.

    I do have a thing with boobs though. I've never actually fondled a girl or had the urge or desire to in person, but sometimes have been aroused by pictures or videos of topless women. I think my mom might have breast fed me too long or something.

  • Awake_My_Soul420@xanga

    Flexamorous, Ambisexual & Queer. Which all mean the same thing according to this test. Lol.

  • Flying_Heart@xanga

    I got ambisexual (and mildly transitioning) and while I do consider myself bisexual I'm not quite sure if I'm really 50-50. I think I'm more of a 2 than a 3 on the Kinsey scale, partially because I've been sexually and romantically attracted to guys for as long as I can remember while I've only had those feelings about girls since high school. Plus, although I'd just as soon experiment with a girl as a guy, it's hard for me to imagine being with a girl long term.

  • VampireOfSeduction@xanga

    9 for ambisexual, 3 for flexamorous, 2 heteroflexible, 1 straight, scored 0 for all sexual traits.
    I have to call it bunk as I don't separate romantic love and sex. I've never been in a real, romantic relationship with another female and never done more than a little kiss for fun/silliness or a dare (or once for money. Men. *rolls eyes*). While it's a fantasy, so are a lot of other things, things that are definitely staying a fantasy. I rarely crushed on girls, if you could even call it a crush, and certainly not to the extent that I crushed on guys.

  • wretched_epiphany@xanga

    @Flying_Heart@xanga - I feel the exact same way!  Most girls I know who consider themselves bi are the opposite, so it's nice to find someone who feels the same way I do, lol.

  • immoral_sensei@xanga

    I got 
    Polyamorous and Metamorphic with some supper sexual.

  • Niiksknox@xanga

    I identify myself as heterosexual. I took the test and got these results: 7 straight, 3 heteroflexible, and 2 ambisexual. I scored 0 for all sexual traits. Sounds about right

  • biggirlsdontcriyiyiyi@xanga
  • articulate_silence@xanga

    Flexamorous, followed by ambisexual. But I coulda told you that! :P Also followed very closely by queer. I was ZERO percent totally straight though, ha ha! I mean, I like women, so that absence on the bar graph was no surprise.

    Interesting test :)

  • rosinababy


    Hi Dear,
     How are you todayrosinaedward11 at hotmail dot c om Um, i am miss ROSINA by name, i wish to have you as my friend so shall we be good friends ? I want us to baseon mutual friendship because A 'Hello' today can mean a friendship tomorrow. Friendship is a word, the very sight of which in print makes the heart warm. A stranger is just a friend you haven't met yet; we got to take time to be friendly because it's the road to happiness so reach me at (rosinaedward11@hotmail.com) i will send you my photo thanks.
     My best regards,ROSINA
  • Sign in to Comment

  • Give eProps (?)

About the Author

  • Jeanette
    • From: Jeanette
    • Name: Jeanette
    • Location: Long Island, New York, United States
    • About Me: I'm fascinated by human behavior! How we -- as human beings and members of this society -- relate to one another in sex and love is particularly interesting to me.
    Stats: This Week All Time
    Posts: 0 16
    Views: 0 55157
    Comments: 0 439
    View all posts by Jeanette

Who recommended?