Friday, 04 May 2012

  • We're All Human: Everyone's Shallow


    Being shallow is part of being a human; many people have trouble accepting this truth because they claim that being shallow is a bad thing. Being shallow isn't a bad thing because we are all shallow to some degree. Of course, there is a line drawn between moderate and excessive just like there's a line drawn in everything else. Everyone has the ability TO feel beautiful/handsome because everyone is beautiful to a certain extent.

    Not everyone is going to find you beautiful, but there's not a certain number system that determines what level of physical attraction you are. If three girls find me sexually attractive, that doesn't make me sexually attractive; that makes me sexually attractive to those three women.

    I can be handsome to one person, sexually attractive to another, physically attractive, ugly, horrendous, monstrous, etc. to someone else. How I feel about myself is an internal agreement.

    If everyone in the world thought I was ugly, I could still call myself handsome because how I feel about myself is not determined by what other people say, but influenced by what other people say. It's nice to receive compliments because it helps me feel better about myself, but the way I feel about myself is my own belief.

    I believe that I am handsome, and I believe that I am less handsome than some men; this doesn't mean that I am correct, nor do I think that they should feel the same way. As a result, I believe that I have earned the ability of dating women at my consciously-determined level of beauty, and would consider myself more fortunate to date a woman of higher beauty than my level.

    To date a woman of lesser beauty would be deprivation of the level of beauty that I have earned; to suggest that people should settle for less than what they earn is unfair. If I am overweight, I have earned the ability to date women who are overweight, but not women that are morbidly obese. I can date a morbidly obese woman, but other factors must take place to determine whether the relationship is fair.

    I am growing bald; if I am to say that I have earned a woman with no genetic baldness (or carry the gene) is unfair. As a result of the unfairness, I would be unjustly shallow.

    Being shallow is perfectly rational because it is biological. Like our desire for procreation, it is something that we have limited control over. What also occurs biologically, in our genes and in our environment, is that we develop preferences to people that we consider dating.

    If I find a woman sexually attractive, these preferences are different than the preferences of women that I find beautiful. Preferences are NOT necessity; this is commonly confused among many women, especially in teen/young adult forums, who wonder if they are not being pursued because they don't possess preferences that men desire.

    During sexual reproduction, meiosis produces genetic variety. As a result of genetic variety, variety occurs in human beings. If there's a variety of men, there's a variety of preferences. There are men who are sexually attracted to women who are morbidly obese, there are men attracted to overweight women, there are men attracted to normal weight women, there are men attracted to underweight women, and so forth.

    The same applies to every other thing about a woman, whether it's the color of her hair, eye color, nose length, breast size, nationality, etc. When it comes to breasts, it's a little bit more complex. However, small breasts still don't determine whether someone will find you beautiful or sexually attractive.

    Perhaps it's an influence, but the variety in human beings allows possibility for a potential mate. Regardless of your looks, there is always someone who finds you beautiful/handsome. Asking other men about their preferences is pointless because men, like women, prefer different things for different reasons. If I prefer an overweight woman, and an underweight woman likes me enough to become overweight herself, she now possesses a preference that I like, but lost another man's attraction because she no longer has a preference.

    If you believe that you can only love one person, then one person is all you need to love. Only one person is important in attraction; all the other individuals are irrelevant. Therefore, there is always someone willing to date you, it's just that... you may not find them at first.

    What it all comes down to is that men and women aren't that different: we're both shallow, we both have preferences, and we both want different things. Women can have desires for sexual relationships, but social pressures suggest that they keep quiet about those sexual relationships or refrain from having those relationships because she would be considered a "slut."

    Many thoughts or feelings that men share can also be shared by women, and vice versa. We are human beings after all. If men and women really were that different, then we would not be classified as the same. Just because a man or a woman is shallow doesn't automatically make him/her a bad person. There will always be plenty of fish in the sea, and there will always be someone out there who shares your common ideals.

    Someone out there wants to date you, and someone out there wants to have sex with you. If you don't like something about yourself, change it. If you ever ask yourself "why are men/women so complicated," it's because you're making them look complicated.

    Biologically, we're complex individuals but if you are able to understand yourself, you are able to understand the opposite gender. If you can successfully do that, then you will know that you don't need to change a single thing about yourself, and you're perfect the way you are.

    (Image Source

Comments (16)

  • Simply_Cynical@xanga
  • GagaMonster

    Wow this was great! I think you really got to the bottom of this topic, and I like that the point is that as long as you're happy with yourself, someone out there will be happy with you just the way you are.  Nice message!

  • wizexel22@xanga

    "Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic
    things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent
    response were you even close to anything that could be considered a
    rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having
    listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your
    soul."

  • Kittyluve@xanga

    Did not read the whole thing.  But I will say there is such a thing as universal beauty to a certain extent.  It's not all that subjective.  If everyone literally thought you're ugly on the outside, then you probably are.  Sorry to burst your bubble there.  But good thing you're not one of them!

  • KasumiCelesta@xanga

    "To date a woman of lesser beauty would be deprivation of the
    level of beauty that I have earned; to suggest that people should settle
    for less than what they earn is unfair
    ."

    You lost me when you started talking about overweight and obese people.

    I spent quite a few minutes trying to construct a response, but there's just so much nonsense here that I don't even know where to start.

  • ccccourage@xanga

    In this case I think you'd be better off being a rock...that being said,  I think this post can be summed up like this.

    "Chill, there is someone out there that is willing to f*ck you!"

  • Statuess

    I'm sure I agree with some of the points you made, but I gave up reading this half way through. Keep it concise!


    However, from what I read, I have three points to make:1. If three (and only three) women in existence find you sexually attractive, yes, that does make you sexually attractive.2. Don't be silly, you can't tell at a glance if the woman carries the gene for hereditary baldness, so it shouldn't even come into an argument about attractiveness or who you have 'earned' the right to date.3. You mentioned this briefly but I feel it needs emphasising- you absolutely can date someone with a different level of attractiveness to yourself if your overall value is similar (or if you're both satisfied with each other!).
  • SoMuchWin@xanga

    Physical beauty is something one is born with, not earned.
    What you can earn, that makes you attractive, is the respect of others.
    And that in turn is earned by being compassionate, considerate, conscientious and courageous.

  • MzKeekz@xanga

    I'll admit I did not read the whole post--but you are quite a good-looking guy.  How's that for shallow? 

  • brandon32490@xanga

    @Kittyluve@xanga - I hate Kat Williams, the comedian, but you should check out this...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZ25o7iYZ50. It goes in line with self-confidence anything else that's dealt with self. So...what you're saying doesn't change anything. I guess we'll agree to disagree though.

  • brandon32490@xanga

    @KasumiCelesta@xanga - If you have nothing to say, then I'll just assume that you agree with me. You Saying that all of my stuff is crap isn't a valid argument. If my stuff is crap...explain. I won't bite, I promise. 

  • KasumiCelesta@xanga

    @brandon32490@xanga - You didn't read my comment carefully.

    1. I don't have "nothing" to say. It's that I have too much to say.
    2. I didn't say ANY of your stuff is "crap." I said it was nonsense. Saying that something doesn't make sense to me and saying that something is stupid are two different things.
    3. I'm not afraid of you biting. It's the Internet.

    In short, I agree with you that most of us are shallow to a degree, but your post is more complex than it needs to be. And I don't agree about "earning" a level of beauty...it just sounds silly. Perception of beauty is different with each person. I have the highest admiration for those who see through the bodies of the disfigured and disabled to love what's on the inside.

  • brandon32490@xanga

    @KasumiCelesta@xanga - I can't take anyone seriously who claims that my stuff is nonsense and then saying that you have too much to say. It doesn't hurt to summarize your viewpoints, or make a small attempt at explaining your viewpoint. Otherwise, I can't take that argument seriously. It's like a person being against abortion and going into an abortion debate saying "I think abortion is bad because it's bad." Okay...and...so...that hardly says nothing about your viewpoint...so I'm going to take that as nothing being said. :\

    It's complex because I wanted to explain in more detail about why you can feel beautiful living in a world where people are shallow. The next time I do a blog, I'll be sure to condense it and simplify it so people won't have to read much or use any logical thought. Or you can...y' know...not read it.

    Lastly, I need you to re-read the entire thing...especially the part where I said that "If I am overweight, I have earned the ability to date women who are
    overweight, but not women that are morbidly obese. I can date a morbidly
    obese woman, but other factors must take place to determine whether the
    relationship is fair." So, to simplify...which is pretty simple to understand in the beginning but...all right...I'm saying that I can fall in love with someone who is less physically attractive, but they have to have other qualities that I can fall in love with...like personality...that thing you can love inside of someone. Essentially, you agree with me. Okay, that's good. :) 

  • P0RCELA1N_D0LL@xanga

    umm...I'm usually not a skank but when I saw that insanely gorgeous/hot/sexy bartender, I wanted to mate with him PRONTO when I say pronto, I mean YES SIR NOW PLZ

  • iloveyoumixtape
  • iloveyoumixtape

     "To date a woman of lesser beauty would be deprivation of the
    level of beauty that I have earned; to suggest that people should settle
    for less than what they earn is unfair
    ."


    What the what?


    This line is in direct contradiction to what seems like the point of your post, which is:  "Regardless of your looks, there is always someone who finds you beautiful/handsome."


    How have you "earned" someone good looking? What are you talking about? You don't "earn" or "deserve" to be with anyone that looks a certain way. You can be attracted to a certain type, and whatever type you are attracted to... that is the type that you should go for.  Not because you have "earned the ability of dating women at my consciously-determined level of beauty" but simply because you find them attractive... no more, no less.  After all, who is to say what is within your range or out of your range?  If you see a hot girl with an average guy, do you assume she is "depriving herself of the level of beauty that she's earned"?  In fact, maybe to her, he is the handsomest guy in the world.  YOU make this point yourself - beauty is partly objective. Therefore who are you to say that you won't date a girl that is lower than this "level of beauty" that you have earned?  Your standard of beauty means nothing other than one girl isn't your type... nothing more and nothing less.


    breasts, it's a little bit more complex. However, small breasts still don't determine whether someone will find you beautiful or sexually attractive."
    ^^  This line just cracked me up, because it's NOT a bit more complex. It's like you're saying "well when it comes to breasts guys really prefer big ones but if you have small ones don't worry, someone will still like you!"  Dude, you would be SHOCKED at how many guys actually prefer smaller breasts.

  • Sign in to Comment

  • Give eProps (?)

About the Author

Who recommended?