Wednesday, 15 June 2011

  • Money Changes Everything


    A common tale that plays out in movies and other forms of entertainment involves the pairing of the rich and poor, either in marriage or convoluted relationships. There's almost always a struggle involving the opulent partner's family and the desire to embrace the less fortunate's roots in poverty, along with the love that stems from it. It's a classic mixture of class warfare and undying love, where .50 caliber bullets and explosives fail to penetrate through the heart of the matter--the integrity of a penniless and fruitful bond.

    Hollywood's obsession with romanticizing partnerships free from the binds of wealth and class, has given way to a new generation of minds pried open by the idealistic hands of time in motion. The idea that money and class have a negligible impact on the success of a relationship has spread, almost as if mass consciousness became the bread and butter of new age dating.

    But how much of an impact does wealth, status and class have on the long-term success of a relationship? In what sense does an abundance of money alter the lifespan of a marriage or relationship?

    Before we touch on that, it's necessary to understand what we call "social stratification" in the Western world. Typically, this is divided into three categories: the upper class, middle class and lower class. For the sake of simplicity, we'll strictly focus on class and social power. We'll come to learn that while money is a factor, it's not as great as we think.

    Class Power: The concept of class power is economically based. The unequal access to material goods keeps a small percentage of individuals at the top and grants them dominance over the majority who seek their goods; thus, they're put in a subordinate position.

    Social Power: For the most part, social power is maintained through endogamy, which means marrying within an ethnic group or class, specifically. It's directly related to class power and social stratification in that it keeps wealth and power within circles, and limits distribution which creates an even greater division between classes.

    What this all means is that social classes are rooted in different forms power and the relationship between dominance and subordination takes center stage. Lines are split, and divisions are created based on wealth, prestige and power in this Capitalist system. Class and status are part of the distribution of power.

    So what does any of this have to do with relationships, which are irrational and emotionally charged?

    Many relationships die at the hands of a power struggle, although we're talking about the non-physical form in this case. One partner will assume the role of dominance and this partner typically has less interest in the bond as well. Having the upper-hand emotionally is one thing, but when you combine a person of wealth with one of a lower social standing, other issues can rear their ugly heads.

    -The feeling of inferiority.
    -Dependence.
    -Exploitation.
    -Familial instability.

    This is a short list of problems that sometimes arise in real relationship where each person comes from a different social class. While it would be nice to believe that these sorts of relationships usually have a Hollywood ending, the truth is that they're hard work, and the differences are difficult to overcome. Relationships are at their best when there's an equal balance of power and understanding, so if you throw a social gap into the mix, you can count on tripping and falling in it.

    Individuals with a position of power command respect and have more options. They have higher odds of getting married due to financial stability or the promise of it based on their background. Higher education at prestigious schools will make for a more desirable partner based on their perceived chance of success alone. Your social status and how others perceive you are key factors in the dating game. In fact, men are trained by dating gurus to carry themselves in a manner that gives the illusion of social superiority. This is great for one-night stands, but the dynamics of a relationship require far more work and self-improvement.

    So how do you give these relationships a better shot at reaching the mythical happy ending?

    With many women being independent these days, it's likely that a man will find himself dating a partner with a higher income and a better home. Traditionally, gender roles dictate that the man is supposed to take care of the woman and bring home dinner, so it's easy to understand why guys cower away in a corner when a strong, independent woman makes her presence known. In this example, it's key for the male to let go of the notion and accept the facts. You aren't inferior for earning less or being the second "bread winner" and you certainly shouldn't be ashamed of what you aspire to do with your life (unless you're planning on becoming a hobo without the shotgun).

    Both partners need to reach an understanding that they have a lot to offer each other emotionally, and make sure the feelings are mutual. Keep things as balanced as possible, and try to understand where the other is coming from. Since you're from different backgrounds and situations, it's necessary to get to know one another down to the last detail. Find out what makes him or her tick, about their home life, their feelings in regards to money and wants vs needs, where they see themselves living in the future, and how they're willing to compromise among other things.

    Understand that a financially stable man or woman can fail to giving you proper support as well. Look beyond gender roles and focus more on your values and goals. Try to share those goals. Realize that while you may find yourself to be compatible with fat wallets, the person's temperament may ruin any chance for a stable union.

    Relationships are more likely to last when there's less of a gap in social classes and for the most part, they aren't as common due to the "wealthy and powerful" mingling amongst each other in most situations. Don't let Hollywood's romanticization lead you to believe that family is the only hurdle to overcome. It's risky, but with hard work and understanding, they can make for beautiful relationships which are surely strung by the bonds of love, not financial gains or hierarchies. It's more of a class issue, not necessarily monetary, but they're both related.

    What are you thoughts?

    Sincerely,
    Nuñez Love Doctor.

    Certified with a PhD in Cyndi Lauper & Financial Romances.

Comments (10)

  • BloodIsLove@xanga

    "Both partners need to reach an understanding that they have a lot to offer each other emotionally, and make sure the feelings are mutual. Keep things as balanced as possible, and try to understand where the other is coming from. Since you're from different backgrounds and situations, it's necessary to get to know one another down to the last detail. Find out what makes him or her tick, about their home life, their feelings in regards to money and wants vs needs, where they see themselves living in the future, and how they're willing to compromise among other things."


    This sums up how we should, ideally, try to bridge any gap that may be (sorely) felt between two people when it comes to this issue. This part of a relationship has to be there well before a couple starts thinking seriously about a long-term relationship that'll involve a need for a financial co-dependence in marriage and future home-buying and baby-making, etc. If it's there, the other stuff, like clash of culture and class and education maybe resulting in inferiotity/superiority complexes should be relatively easy to handle and work past. All I'm really saying is I genuinely don't mind this sort of factor of money, who might make more, education level, etc., that could cause clashes and such with a partner, so long as the connection is real.


    Having said that, I agree that the larger a social gap is between two, the less likely it is they'll succeed... I am going by what I've observed in my community, nothing more or less. Family, at least where I'm from, is way easier to deal with on the whole than the factors you address here!

  • starcrossedloversdivine@xanga

    Well, my bf is definitely from the upper middle class, while my family is from the lower middle class... but I'm independent of my parents and he is not. I make roughly slightly over 30k a year by myself, while he still mooches off of mom and dad, and works for his father's business occasionally. He has an Infiniti and lives in a huge house, while I have a Mazda and live in a small apartment.  I have virtually no debt, while he has a lot.  I think I have the upper hand when it comes to financial standing, but to society he's still the rich one. And I'm sure that's what he thinks too. 

  • xx_ng_xx@xanga

    I'm lower middle class and my guy is upper middle class. Although I'm socially higher than him and I network a lot, he also works for what he gets too, but sometimes he uses other people to get what he wants -_-. 

  • KasumiCelesta@xanga

    As nice as it sounds to meet a guy who has a status of prestige through his career, I don't think I could handle being in a marriage with him. As the younger of two kids in my family I'd be used to the spoiling, but also as the woman I suspect that such a guy would expect me to be a housewife (i.e. doing ALL of the laundry, cooking, cleaning, and so on), which is not what I want to be. So I'd much prefer to be with a guy who's around my social status and knows how to do things around the house.

  • P0RCELA1N_D0LL@xanga

    it makes too much dollars and sense with the top down and sunglasses on...cruising in my benz

  • TheNotoriousGOD@xanga

    i'm always afraid that girls will only want to date me for my money.  it's difficult to vet out the bad ones.

  • WaitingToShrug@xanga

    Two things: 1. Wealth and power aren't stagnant, therefore, it's not as if there's only so much to go around, and the wealthy are hoarding it all. Total wealth in a country can grow and diminish, and a person's wealth is not based only on his access to materials, but on the power of his mind, ambition, and sense. If access to material (i.e., existing wealth) were the only thing making that top percentage wealthy, you wouldn't see any of the successful businessmen coming from poor or middle class backgrounds, which thankfully is the case in the US. Further, owning material or products doesn't designate those who must purchase them to a position of subservience. In fact, in a free market, one in which neither the business owners, employees, or customer can legislate in their own favor, the businessman must bow to the demands of the customer, usually less wealthy than himself, in order to stay in business.


    And 2, emotions should be based in reason, and therefore, rational.


    I definitely agree that a common background helps a relationship work. Not neccessarily because of those feelings of inferiority, dependence, etc, which no individual should feel when basing his self-worth on the merit of his mind and abilities. Having a common background though, can help you understand your partner better though, and his or her values, which is so important in a successful relationship.


  • AsylumBlue

    @WaitingToShrug@xanga - What? I never stated that a person's wealth is only based on access to materials. That's certainly part of it, but I simplified it and kept it short for the sake of the post. Of course there are exceptions and people can rise up to acquire wealth and power, I'm not denying that. However, it would be foolish to say that opportunities to improve one's life aren't greatly affected by social and status classes as well as political position.

    The free market system functions on the premise that it'll sometimes fail, and ironically, in the U.S. for example, they resort to Socialism in order to help correct this "self-correcting" market. It's just economic Darwinism where less successful businesses and
    the compassionate are eliminated during the "self-correcting" period in
    favor of the ruthless, greedy and in some cases, state backed
    businesses.

    A good example of dominance/subservience would be the employer and employee. The employer controls the wages and weeds out employees, and when there's an economic crisis where jobs are harder to find, the person seeking employment must bow down to the employer and accept shitty wages if they want to feed their families. It goes right back to the idea that those who don't have great life chances are also less likely to get higher education or rise to the top in order to avoid these shitty wages. Let's also not forget that it's quite popular to outsource labor.

  • splinter1591@xanga

    @TheNotoriousGOD@xanga - don't let them know how much money u have.  

  • TheNotoriousGOD@xanga

    @splinter1591@xanga - it's inevitable once i'm asked what my occupation is, or once she sees my apartment :(

  • Sign in to Comment

  • Give eProps (?)

About the Author

  • AsylumBlue
    • From: AsylumBlue
    • Name: AsylumBlue
    • Location: New York City, New York, United States
    • About Me: The musician in me is constantly dueling with my inner writer, trying to take its place. What I'm attempting to do is allow them to live harmoniously, but it seems that I'm a terrible peacemaker, because they haven't stopped bickering or flinging spit-balls at one another. I write political satire, short stories, poems and... actually, I can pretty much write about anything; I'm flexible (not physically, unfortunately). If I had to choose, it would be writing softcore romance novels full of seduction, extramarital affairs and incredibly specific details. I'm kidding about that last part, I think.
    • True Lifetime
    Stats: This Week All Time
    Posts: 0 103
    Views: 0 671494
    Comments: 0 6923
    View all posts by AsylumBlue

Who recommended?