Wednesday, 28 July 2010
It’s not only books that we shouldn’t judge, it’s men too. Look what happened to Charlotte in Sex and the City. She ended up with a guy who was a cross between Mr. Clean and a naked mole rat. It all comes down to the sparks, the fireworks, the energy between you both, the “je ne sais quoi,” which unfortunately us humans cannot control.
So this whole “who’s your type?” ish is driving me absolutely crazy. No one has a type, unless we’re only talking about looks. Do you want to date a human or a Ken doll? Now obviously you shouldn’t completely rule out the physical attributes but they definitely cannot not be the deciding factor.
For example, I went out on a date with a guy who was John Travolta circa Saturday Night Fever. Pretty hot right? Well it wasn’t until my spicy tuna roll arrived, that I learned that this guy had a Forrest Gump fetish and had as much personality as a goldfish.
Do you know guys with great qualities but you never thought to give them a shot because of their schnoz or bad acne? I am for sure guilty as charged for this offense. Come on people, we all need to get off our high horses!
I know, I know, we all want Taylor Lautner, but six packs fade, my friends, and can immediately transform into the OTHER six pack...of beer.
Haven’t you been walking down the street and noticed a couple and thought to yourself “How did HE/SHE end up with HIM/HER?” Drum roll please...it is simply because they got the chemistry! Are we that superficial these days? It’s often the couples that are each other’s physical soul mate that are the ones that end up badly. I’m pretty sure that Brangelina is headed for disaster. What is Shiloh supposed to be.. the Jesus of beauty? Anyway, I’m not saying that two attractive people can’t find love with each other but you do NOT want to be someone’s arm candy and visa versa. So what if the cover is somewhat worn, it is the content that is important!
So I will leave you with some food for thought: Have you dated someone solely based on their appearance or personality?