Saturday, 24 April 2010

  • The Coveted "L" Word


    Every couple weeks or so, there's a new post about how people immaturely or prematurely use the "L" word. The prominent reasoning is that using the "L" word is immature because the person using it generally doesn't have a clear understanding of what the "L" word encompasses. Either it's that the person is too young/inexperienced or the person doesn't know his/her SO long enough to be able to understand what love is, or simply both.

    While I do not deny the possibility that one doesn't know his/her SO well enough for such little time to be able to make such a statement, I completely disagree with the thought that age or experience defines the "L" word. I used it when I was 14, and I don't regret it. I still use it today, if the situation deems it worthy.

    A couple years ago, my friend told me, "you're 17 now, you have no idea what love is."
    So, tell me, wise man, what is love?

    I guarantee you that wise man will have no better answer than what my 14 year old self has. Although his answer may entail more relationship aspects or perhaps have more sound reasoning, he does not know love. At the very least, he cannot know my love.

    Love, like everything else in the relationship realm, is relative (beauty, attraction, chemistry, you name it). When I'm 22, 28, or even 44 (hopefully with a wife), I will still have no definition of what love is. At what age does one suddenly have a clear understanding of love? At what age does one definitively start using it correctly? Oh, if only love were that convenient.

    When I tell you "I love you," I mean, "as far as I know in my life, from my experiences, what I feel for you is beyond my own comprehension, and I can only imagine that it is love." So, when I said it at 14, I meant, "as far as I know, what I feel for you is love." When I say it now, I take into account my new understanding through experiences, and I mean, "as far as I know, what I feel for you is love." A dictionary definition will not dam my emotional river, and if my river flows passionately, then the word "like" will not suffice.

    Is my theory of relativity far-fetched? Are my views too idealistic? Or do you agree that the "L" word is relative and determined on the experiences and analysis of the user?

Comments (30)

  • Sign in to Comment

  • Give eProps (?)

About the Author