Sunday, 20 December 2009
-
Why Do Women Stay?
Reading "I Learned about Love from my Parents", I too, have wondered why many parents stay together for the children's sake. More specifically, I've tried to understand why women with children stay in a conflict-ridden marriage. From a female's point of view, and especially in my country, I think many women in stay for the children's sake or because of the financial difficulties they'll incur if they left their husbands. To illustrate my point concerning money, I'll refer to another fb note of mine where I discuss the socioeconomic and legal changes surrounding the conceptualization of 'the family' in my country, as has happened elsewhere.
Until the 1970s in the West (and 1993 in Malta), law related to marriage was founded on four assumptions of the marital contract namely that: the husband is the head of the household; the husband is responsible for economic support; the wife is responsible for domestic service and childcare and the wife would take the husband’s name.
Today Western family law has adopted a gender-neutral approach that emphasizes gender equality and shared responsibility rather than gender differentiation. 'Husbands and wives are now assigned the same economic functions in family law. They are both considered responsible for their own economic well being, as well as that of their spouse and children. Wives are no longer conceptualized as dependents but as equal to their husbands, and children are regarded, at least in law, as the dependents of both parents' (Eichler, 1997, p.13).
Despite the changes that have occurred, legal conceptualizations of the family alone do not alter social behavior. A cursory look at how many Maltese women are in paid employment and how many men are primary caretakers of their children proves that we still live in a patriarchal society structured on the male-breadwinner model and founded on traditional family setups. Marriage, in reality, is not practiced on the equal partnership model. Most men 'bring home the bacon' and most women are still mainly responsible for domestic work and childcare.In other countries, various socioeconomic changes have led to a sharp increase in the number of married women who work in paid labour. This is not the case in Malta. Here, we have the lowest female labour force participation rate in the EU. Why is this so? Maybe women don't want to go out to work? Maybe it suits them to stay at home so it really doesn't 'pay' to go to work? Maybe some men do not want their wives to work? Maybe this is due to traditions and customary norms? Maybe there needs to be more childcare centres? Maybe structures have to change and work has to become more flexible to allow women to manage their work and domestic/childcaring roles better? Maybe more financial incentives have to be given to women? These are just a few of the possible explanations as to why women, either through choice or constraint, do not engage in paid employment to the extent as their European counterparts.
However some married women (as is the norm in other countries), either through necessity or choice, do work outside the home. Most, however, work in part-time jobs especially if they have dependent children to care for. Some work fulltime. In the case of 'the dual-earner household', marriage should truly be a partnership of equals. However numerous studies have shown that this is far from the case - women still do most of the work inside the home irrespective of their work status and this includes most of the 'emotion work'. Whats more, working women still earn much less than men do. The gender pay gap is a phenomenon that can't be ignored. In reality this means that husbands can use the fact that they earn more than their wives to exert more power over them in the matrimonial home. Money is often used as a weapon by men over women. And therefore, this is perhaps what keeps many unhappily married women from filing for a separation (and divorce) from their husbands. The fear of not making ends meet may be too much for women to bear, especially when they have children.
Now what happens when a Maltese working woman decides to leave her husband and they both continue to reside in the matrimonial home until it is sold? Well ironically, since they are equal partners in the eyes of the law, they have to split everything 50/50 including mortgages, bills, other expenses, upkeep of children and so forth. In such a situation, a wife ends up being hit much harder financially than her husband due to her limited and unequal income. So while Maltese family law was intended to make women more at par with men in marriage than ever before, in such cases working wives end with the raw end of the deal. Where is the equality here given the disparity in earnings? In my opinion, when it comes to incurring expenses, the law should consider the earnings of each spouse for feasibility and fairness sake. Each spouse should in turn pay relevant expenses in proportion to his/her respective earnings otherwise women will continue to suffer disproportionately to males. And boy can I relate to this. Never before have I felt so poor and financial insecure as I am feeling now, despite the fact that I work in fulltime employment!!!
Such situations make us stop and think about why many Maltese women don't work, why many don't leave their husbands and the financial difficulties they often find themselves in when they do. Such situations make us question if marriage, revolves primarily around money and the financial security it brings with it. It's no wonder than, that many unhappy wives ponder heavily over the thought and repeatedly ask themselves 'should i stay or should i go?' For freedom and pursuit of happiness (literally) has a price, and one that many women are not too willing to pay.My song post today refers to working women and the emancipation that paid labor should bring with it. There have been many songs written about work but not that many from a female's perspective. One that springs to mind is Donna Summer's song She Works hard for the Money. This song rings so true, especially for those women who work very hard to make ends meet.
Why do you think women stay in an unhappy marriage? And would you agree?
Post a Comment
- Back to datingish's Datingish Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in datingish's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)



Recommend


Comments (12)
I think they stay because they have invested so much time and effort in their relationship and it is sad or unbearable to let it go even if there are problems, because they think their love for their spouse will eventually work things out but often times, I think they just feel stuck in an emotional and financial rut. they don't want to hurt their children if they divorce and have to fight a custody battle and possibly cause emotional pain if they see their parents apart and have to visit their parents separately but they know that their fighting in front of the children or if they don't fight in front of them, then they'll pretend to live happily when they aren't but their children might gradually catch on to what is going on, so that will still hurt them emotionally. so either way they can't stand to see their children in pain and they are conflicted with staying or separating.
Stockholm Syndrome!
battered wives begin to think that abuse = love. :(
this is my perspective from my mom's marriage...
she stayed basically because of the children and because she thought that she could love him and it was wrong to leave him because they were christians. my mom stayed in her marriage all the way up to the point she caught him cheating. little did she know that he had been cheating on him for the past 12 years of their marriage, and get this, they've only been married for a little over 12 years. after she found him cheating, she was willing to stay with him if he repented. which i think is so ridiculous. but here's my two cents.
My parents stayed together for my sister and I. It was certainly not for financial reasons, as my mother earns about 70% more than my father. My parents first separated when I was in 4th grade, and they got back together when I was in sixth grade, finally divorcing when I graduated high school. The separation (when I was in 4th grade) was very hard for my family. My grades went from As to Cs. My sister started stealing money. My mother started smoking and was extremely testy and irritable, causing her to be very harsh to my sister and I. All of this subsided when my parents got back together. I know that many families handle separation with young children better than mine did, but it wasn't working for my family. I'm grateful that my parents got back together, because my sister and I were headed down a bad path, and I believe that them getting back together helped avoid that.
No idea. Mentally abusive relationships are hard to point out, especially from the inside. But physical abuse is simple. The second my boyfriend or husband hit me, I'd beat his ass down with a tire iron or chair or beer bottle, then get a divorce.
I can see where things might get tricky with little ones involved. But still...no idea.
Between my ex and I we had 4 kids. I helped raise his two from a previous marriage from the ages of 5 and 7 to about 11 and 13. They were the only thing that was hard to leave behind. I stayed long enough to ebay off everything that I could sell, work 2 crappy jobs to scrounge up enough money to get my own place. Leaving was the BEST DECISION I have ever made.
I have been jobless, homeless, lonely, depressed, eating from the food bank, on welfare, lived in housing with mold, rats, roaches, and rain, and I have not looked back once. He was emotionally and economically abusive; I had no access to any of our money.
I think a lot of women stay because they don't think they can survive, maybe they get comfortable with a certain lifestyle. If you want out, you will find a way. Don't stay for the sake of the kids! Your kids need a healthy happy mommy to take care of them.
I think women stay in unsatisfying relationships because they either believe that things will turn around like it used to be or because they believe that there is no one else out there any better. Which makes me sad, because there is always someone else out there who deserves you and will treat you much better. But it is always more complicated with children involved.
In addition to a lot that's already been said, after a certain amount of time 'habit' plays a large role.
People, especially those in older generations, do not like change. If they've lived with their SO for XX number of years it's become their life, a way they define themselves. They intended to spend the rest of their lives this way, and created emotional and physical ties not just to their SO but also to their living situation. The thought of leaving can be thought of as such a traumatic change that even if they consider it they never can really see themselves acting on those thoughts...
...which is a horrible thing. If it's not going to work out, it's not going to work out. I'm terrified of being in that situation which is why I'll never ever get married :)
There are many reasons, I believe, that women stay in relationships they're not happy with. For some, it might be money. It's less appealing to strike it out on your own when it's very likely that your quality of life will suffer dramatically. You might be miserable, but at least you have a roof over your head and you're not worried about where your next meal is coming from.
For others, emotional dependency, "staying together for the kids", and just fear of the unknown are all contributing factors. No one wants to be alone, even if they're miserable with the person they're with. Children are emotionally fragile creatures, and any mother would hate to disrupt their child's life, if the child is already coping well enough. We all know how badly so many children take divorce- plummeting grades, loss of friendships, and the onset of depression are all recorded outcomes of many divorces. Nobody wants to inflict that, even if it might end up teaching the children a warped view of how a relationship is supposed to work. And, you don't know what will happen if you leave. You might lose your job- then what? While previously, a lost job would have been your husband's problem, now it's yours, and you have a mortgage and kids to feed.
My mothers was because she didnt want to leave her son without a father like she did me. It pissed me off to no end, like did I turn out that bad? I didnt leave mine because I wanted to work it out with someone who just had different ideas of fun and different life goals than myself. It hurts, because hes never been abusive towards me and its been my first relationship (4 years and friends for 7). My mother and I are better off in the long run though.
One of the most frustrating things for people outside a battering relationship is trying to understand why a woman doesn't just leave. A letter to Dear Abby on the subject was signed "Tired of Voluntary Victims."
The most important thing to keep in mind is that extreme emotional abuse is always present in domestic violence situations. On average, an abused woman will leave her partner 6-8 times. The reasons they return or stay in the relationship vary from case to case. Some of these include:
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Lucy
http://businesseshome.net