Saturday, 01 August 2009

  • Would You Rather...The Lesser of Two Evils

    Miss Rhino

    Would you rather be neurotically attached to your sexual partners or compulsively push them away?

    On the one hand, you've got the stage 5 clinger.

    You've slept with a person and immediately believe that he/she is your soul's perfect mate. He/she begins to consume your thoughts. Stalk him/her on Facebook, follow his/her Twitter, hack into his/her email and spend all night reading conversations with his/her mom in the hopes that your name will come up alongside the words "true" and "love". You want to spend every waking and sleeping and not-sleeping-but-should-be hour with this person. Over-eager and possessive, you are attached. This immediately frightens and bewilders the object of your affection, and he/she inevitably breaks things off. Heartbreak is constantly looming around every corner.

    On the other hand, there's the runaway bride syndrome.

    You've slept with a person and now it's time to run. Your neurosis sets in and the hard-to-get mentality reaches an extreme. He/she has had you now, but now he/she can't. It's better to have the person chasing after you than to be too easily accessible. Isn't it? Distance is your friend and clingy simply isn't part of your vocabulary. One-night-stands become your forte as the notches on your bedpost add up, but the number of relationships never seems to change.

    You push him/her away to see if he/she pull back. But ultimately your non-committal attitude and affliction to dating norms has driven them away for good. In this case, heartbreak would be looming around every corner, if you had let yourself get close enough to feel it.

    Which is the lesser of these two dating evils? I'm not sure there is one. But if you had to choose...

    Would you rather become too attached too easily or keep your heart on lock-down and at a distance? 

Comments (19)

  • Sign in to Comment

  • Give eProps (?)

About the Author

Who recommended?