
Okay, something I feel I need to write about is this idea that guys are superficial tail hunters and nothing else. Women seem to have this idea that how they appraise the opposite sex is better than how males do it because it is more commonly acceptable. But, this isn't really true. Both genders, because of genetic, societal, and environmental factors, appraise possible mates in differing, but equally shallow ways.
We all need to realize this. When you make any kind of judgment or opinion of someone you haven't met or talked to, your opinion of him or her is going to based on superficial things (this is how stereotypes work, by the way. You judge a group based on what appear to be common characteristics). This is in contrast to people (like friends and family) who you know very well, and have knowledge and experience with them to base your opinions on.
So, to start, I will try to, in a short way, talk about how men and women (heterosexual ones. I don't have the research with me to talk about homosexual attraction, but whatever. I'm not a damn professor of this crap) appraise possible mates based on nothing more than appearances.
First up, guys. Easy enough, because it is plastered throughout our society. Guys like big tits, big asses, and skinny stomachs. This is based on the waist-hip ratio idea. Men look for large hips in comparison to waist because this shows how
fertile a woman appears to be. This goes back to the old days. We have evolved to look for mates that will make it easier to reproduce. So there's that. As for the breast size, I would guess that part of that comes from the same thing (larger breasts would imply that a woman could care for a child better), but I do believe that most of guys' infatuation with big boobs come from our society. If you look at the emphasis put on breasts in the US compared with Europe, you will notice that we care more about large hooters than our European relatives. And, for why we guys look for skinny girls, look at the media. In the '20s, it was
way more attractive to be what would now be called "plump" than it is today.
Anyway. I'm not making an excuse. I think it's pretty lame how much guys worry about things that.
And the girls... I am going to start this by saying that, though girls tend to be more monogamous than men, they are just as sexual. Ladies, you know that hormone spike you get once a month during ovulation? That high amount of testosterone? Yeah. We have that
all the time. Not an excuse. Just something to remember.
But, whatever. When a woman appraises a male, she is just as petty as guys are, but in a completely different way. You know what drives it? Money. Well, kind of. Women have been trained and have evolved to look for stability in a mate and someone that will be able to take care of a family. So, a male that is better groomed and dressed has the appearance of money. Money means that their family will be taken care of - for the most part, at least.
An experiment in the UK showed this. A man was shown to women and the women were asked to appraise his looks. He was wearing jeans and a sweater. They gave him about a 3-4 out of 10. They then showed him to another group, but this time they gave him a suit and sunglasses and had him stand with more assurance in his posture. He went up to a 7 out of 10. When asked how he appeared to be in the first trial, the common answer was a blue collar worker who made some money, but didn't have a career. The second time, it was said that he had power and that he might have been an executive or politician. The reason this is comparable to how guys appraise girls is that this doesn't reflect personality. Yes, you will have a greater chance of picking someone who dresses and might make more money, but you know nothing about his or her opinions, demeanor, or general outlook in life. You are still superficially judging somebody (which is okay! There is nothing wrong with this. This is how we as a species have survived).
But, none of this is relevant in the end. We pick people that stay in our lives based on way more than first appearances. When judging a possible relationship and not just initial attraction, both genders tend to pick very similar qualities to look for. When looking for a long-term relationship, do you think guys are
consistently dumb enough to base their criteria solely on bust and hip measurements? No, we don't. We appraise girls like girls appraise us. In my social psych class, we actually demonstrated this. My professor asked us what we look for in a person to date. Things like respect, honesty, intelligence, career, and similar interests appeared in
both genders' boxes. Although, the guys did have one the girls didn't: good credit score, which I think was the best answer. Problem is, that one came from my gay friend, Andrew... so... yeah...
In the end, we all look for the same kinds of attributes in people we want in our lives. Yes, of course we look at superficial things
at first, but, in the end, guys or girls, we want the same thing: healthy relationships.
I apologize for the length. But, this has been bugging me for while.
Side note. What this means: Guys aren't pigs. Guys
and girls are pigs. We all make petty judgments based on appearances. Oink.
Your significant other can have friends of the opposite sex. We don't make and keep
friends just because they are attractive. Hell, we all have some ugly ass friends (or, they are unattractive to us, at least. That's why we tend not to date them).
We are all in the same boat. Guys, girls, stop being asses about these kinds of things. :D
Comments (34)
So basically everyone is shallow and superficial.
Awesome!
Oh well. I love money.
Really? Because I couldn't care less about money
Seriously
just no.
Spike of estrogen each month, not testosterone?
I knew all of this. :O Plus we also all look for symmetrical faces, I read that somewhere too.
That's why you always need to get to know a person before you start judging them. I trust people until the trust is broken. So in the same way, appearances should not make you think poorly of a person until they prove that they're just not as great as they seem (or way better than they look).
I get everything you said. And that is ONE thing we all look for. But there are much much more. And I don't think any amount of research will ever amount to what we all really look for and all that scientific mumbo jumbo we keep trying to use to put a reason behind things is ever going to stop.
You either like someone or you don't.
I think it's as simple as that.
:]
SO EVERYONE SHOULD STOP COMPLAINING!
mmhmm
c[;
wow... I don't know if i should laugh at this or simply...
well no i can't help but laugh!! This crap is worthy of being featured??? Its so... wrong! LOL!
@Jack_Daniels_Distillery@xanga - thanks for the kind words :D
what about it seems wrong to you?
@MattFreakinNix@xanga - hmmm its just too blanketed really. Not every guy wants to find someone based on physical attraction first. Some men are turned on by intelligence. Others by feet, and others by a myriad of things. Same goes for women - and I think its almost wrong to say "Women are attracted to - well Money"
That's really pegging them to be shallow in a way.
I could go on, but I am talking with a few people and can't properly give you good feedback. Sorry
@Jack_Daniels_Distillery@xanga - no, you are totally right about that. People have different preferences.
The money thing was a joke. I was speaking mostly about security. Women (when looking at appearances alone) look for security (or money, as it is in our society).
I made this blog mostly as a response to another one that complained about guys checking girls out and being shallow. I wanted to make a rebuttal. So, this probably comes off as being more shallow than it should.
The main point is that this kind of thing is how a lot of people pick between Random Person A and Random Person B. And, this has no bearing on relationships. This is just first appearances, nothing more. :D
to each their own. i'd prefer a guy in a flannel shirt and a nice pair of jeans over a guy wearing sunglasses and a suit (slightly douchebag-esque?), but that's just me.
but i agree with your friend... good credit score is very important in the long run. hahaha
@MattFreakinNix@xanga - fair enough - thanks for clearing that up :)
I concur. However, we all need the superficial side of things. We all approach people who pique our interest. Whether it's being physically attracted to them or not.
oh man i just want a guy that will sing to me, even if he can't.
maybe write a song about me.
and definitely make me a cupcake.just sayin'.
:) Nice post. I agree with the credit score, if I were a guy. Because truth of matter is, most girls are shopaholics, from my experience, where I come from, and I'm pretty sure a guy doesn't want to be in debt after marriage. lolÂ
  x AmieAmazingly... I don't really care for money. As long as the guy isn't broke and can afford to do what he wants it's all good. I'd go for the guy in the jeans and sweater before I go for the guy in the suit.
LOL @ Jack_Daniels_Distillery@xanga. Guys attracted to women's feet is not the same with attracted to physical appearances? Puhhleaaseee..
And guys.. wanted to be more superior in everything. Even among other guys too. So.. guys turned on by girls' intelligence? Yeah.. at the beginning. After that? He prolly looking for another girl because he feel inferior toward her.
Guys love competition. They are not turned on by girls that can match or even smarter/stronger/better than us. Maybe once in a blue moon. But that's about it.
I'm a guy. And just saying honest thing. We all have ego. Ofcourse we often don't admit it, that we hate to lose.
@KiTtYkAt037@xanga - Nope, it's testosterone. It's somewhere around ovulation to make the woman more likely to have sex around her most fertile time.
Both genders are chock full of testosterone. Women just have less most of the time, but it spikes to male levels once a month. :)
Agreed. While most girls claim personality to be the most important part of a guy [which I also agree with], it is just plain annoying when they claim it`s the first thing they look at. Unless they have "funny" tattooed across their forehead, it`s their looks you face first. Period.
Great post ;]
I'm bothered by the post because it makes a blanket generalization (e.g., guys like skinny girls) and then acknowledges that this isn't universal and is influenced by culture. Many "attractive" desires aren't genetically inclined at all, which that sort of demonstrates... so I think it's premature to say girls like this or guys like that when it's based on nurture over nature.
These lines narrow as we get older. Trust me babes, in twenty years what you find attractive now will not be; this isn't so much about personal depth as it is a reflection of what we all see in the mirror. Think about it.
good post!!
hey, you forgot to mention the lips!
btw, with regards to the british psych study: citation needed, thanks.
@Basilissa@xanga - i agree with you, that's the same thing my mom tells me but it's sad that we base just about every thing in a relationship on outward appearances. i'm as much to blame as anyone else.
whatever happened to looking from the inside out?
I'm not really attracted to money. I actually do value looks and appearance in a man. If making money to support myself wasn't my responsibility, I wouldn't be going to school--instead I'd be maintaining my looks and waiting to be picked up by a rich, successful guy who's going to take care of me. I don't care if he's got a lot of money, if he's butt-ugly, that's going to stand out to me. I'm not saying looks are the MOST important, but it is on my list of preferences.
But maybe I'm just in the minority?