hmm, interesting

Haha....I can respect this post being that I was this way before I met a lady that made me want to stop the rotating schedule I had going. You hit the nail on the head with this one sir....good post....

Apparently, it is "okay" for men to slept around, but it isn't okay for women to do the same.

If  you're a womanizer, that's great. But I have to disagree with you on the STD part. People who have multiple partners at the same time will have a higher chance of contracting an STD (b/c there will be a higher probablility that they are practicing unsafe sex)...and having sex while under the influence of alcohol increases that risk even more because as we all know alcohol impairs ones judgement. Again, I am not saying this specifically to you. I'm only speaking in general.

As for your statement about date rape. I'm not going in that again. You don't really have much respect for women, but then again we all know that by now. Be a womanizer. No one really cares. Just don't lie to the girls you sleep with that they are the only ones in your life... however, if that were true, womanizers wouldn't have such a bad rep.

Hmm... I still hate you guys.  That lifestyle seems sooo wasteful.

i knew all this stuff about womanizer
there just guys who are playing the field until they feel as if they should settle down
what i don't understand is how girls act as if the signs of a guy being a womanizer isn't there
and why they act as if they are always being taking advantage over.
why can girls be manizers(the word sounds totally stupid)

That was interesting.  Kind of an articulation of what I already knew, but it doesn't make the idea of a womanizer any more appealing.

see, here's the thing about this article; there are some parts that are spot on, but there are very much other parts that throw me off a bit.

"We enjoy the company and affection of women.  This is pretty obvious
already.  But our main goal is not simply to sleep with any Plain Jane
or to add any notches to a bedpost.  Rather, we enjoy the feeling that
someone thinks of us and admires us.  Sex is not even necessary.  The
simple thought that you can have it at any time is rewarding enough. 
In return, we try to show them a good time.  I believe that's a fair
trade."

... On spot. There's no need for sex in the least bit at all, but just the little things like getting a text saying "how are you" or "I miss you" mean more than anything, especially on a down day. Where you fucked up was, that whole sex talk period. There are rules you follow, b/c if you don't, you crossover from 'womanizer' to 'player'.

Rule one; Don't kiss. Period. Do your studying; once you cross that physical boundary, there's a 90% chance that you won't be able to go back. That kiss is the point of no return in most woman's minds and you don't want to be a 'Player'.
(So by technicality, you sir, fucked up by fucking. meh...)

Rule two; Establish and speak about your thoughts on the two of you and where you stand. If you're really about intimate relationships with those FEW people that caught your interest, then you should share your thoughts and feelings freely.
The thing about dating and relationships are, you're held to a particular standard b/c you've tied your feelings to a particular person. If you do something thinking about you, it usually makes the other person feel expendable With those close relationships, IF DONE RIGHT, you don't have those limitations in the least bit. You both should know that what you have is between the two of you, and that your relationships AND HERS have nothing to do with one another.  It kills future problems if ppl meet or know one another and don't like each other.

Rule three; Expendability is not an option.
Being well worded, and/or naturally good with women means nothing if you treat them as if they don't have feelings. There's nothing I'm annoyed with more, then a guy that thinks all women are the same. Again, another 'player' characteristic, not a 'womanizer' one. The interchangability is based on the concept of YOU expanding yourself and interests and growing. Trading around b/c a girl gets mad at you, is giving the feeling of being replaceable. Cut that out. Work it out, and be mature about it. Give as much as you take, and give freely at that.

I think you have your concepts mixed up.
I'm naturally good with people, male and female alike, so i've received the 'womanizer' tag a few times in my life to say the least. It's in ignorance though.. unless they ran into you first. Yes men and women are responsible for their own feelings, but how many women do you know that share physical activity, without emotional attachment to those acts? With great power, comes great responsibility dear sir. :)

So... womanizer=player?

@strawberryShy@xanga - I appreciate it. :) I don't believe people should be punished for their qualities; they should be smart and selective about those that they share them with, and how they use them. Agreed?

P.S. Mochasprinkle... *sigh*
Sir, you've lost another good girl.

I like your attempt at saying that picking, choosing, tossing, and replacing women is "womanizing."  It's one thing to be friends with multiple women, treating them w/respect, chilling, hanging out, drinking a few beers, and telling 'em straight up that you don't wanna deal w/drama, etc...but to just so flippantly go thru women like that??  To think women are so--disposable??

@Simply_Cynical@xanga - I think you've got the better idea...

:e)

Hey, I used to be the woman version of this! Would that make me a "Manizer"? LOL

i see.

Sorry dude, but the idea of "playing the field" is the reason some women develop a distrust of guys in general. If you want to be friends with women, then be friends, but if you want aspects of a romantic relationship, then have one. I believe an aspect of manhood is the ability to commit and be decisive.

Be hot or cold, don't be lukewarm. (a reference to the Book of Revelation, not the Katy Perry song.)